The one "story" we (the kids) always hear about that day is how HOT it was. The church was not air-conditioned - it wasn't even air-conditioned after it was turned into our school gymnasium in the 1980s - BUT the reception hall thankfully was air-conditioned. Since I know the places in which to obtain historical weather information, I decided to look up the weather details of that day. I found two Cleveland observation stations not too far from Parma. Here are their temperature observations for September 1:
My parents, Terry and Jennifer (Bellan) Kowalski were married on September 1, 1973 at St. Anthony of Padua Church in Parma, Ohio. To commemorate the day, I've created a special online photo album of their wedding pictures. The album can be found at this link: http://kowalski-bellan.weebly.com/kowalski-bellan-wedding-album.html The one "story" we (the kids) always hear about that day is how HOT it was. The church was not air-conditioned - it wasn't even air-conditioned after it was turned into our school gymnasium in the 1980s - BUT the reception hall thankfully was air-conditioned. Since I know the places in which to obtain historical weather information, I decided to look up the weather details of that day. I found two Cleveland observation stations not too far from Parma. Here are their temperature observations for September 1: The average high temperature for September 1st in Cleveland is around 79F, so yes, that's pretty warm, and it was likely quite humid, too. Several observations stations mostly east of Parma recorded some precipitation for the day, likely due to smaller "pop-up" thunderstorms. (The second column shows rainfall for September 1, in inches.)
0 Comments
Source: Wikipedia.org Most of you who read my blog regularly already know that in my pre-kid days, I worked as a meteorologist. One of my former professors, Dr. John Knox, made the news today for a study of his that was recently published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. Using another woman's Facebook page that successfully helped reunite lost objects with their owners, he and his students traced the paths of peoples' personal items as they were picked up and deposited by storms during the April 27, 2011 tornado outbreak in Alabama. Some of the recovered items had great amounts of sentimental value to the people who lost them, and, as stated in the article, "Knox said he sought to teach them how to conduct the research in a way that was ethical and sensitive to the victims since the tornadoes destroyed lives and homes." Ten years ago, I would have found this study interesting mostly for the potential it has to help scientists understand the dynamics of a severe storm system. (Imagine a tornado striking a facility containing toxic or radioactive substances and needing to know where to evacuate and/or warn people who live downstream.) Since "crossing over" into the role of a family historian, I have developed a new appreciation for the destructive potential of Mother Nature. Yes, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, wildfires cause terrible damage to buildings and infrastructure, but what about the family heirlooms INSIDE those buildings? Photo albums, birth certificates, church sacrament and education records, newspaper clippings, letters, and diaries all help tell the stories of our ancestors and will someday help tell OUR stories. When items such as these are picked up by violent atmospheric winds or damaged beyond repair in a flood or wildfire, they are likely gone forever and so is a part of our families' histories. Unlike our ancestors, we are fortunate today to have the option of digitization when it comes to photos and any sort of paper-based records. But how many of us actually do it? Not only that, but once the information is scanned onto a computer, how many of us save it in multiple places - a separate 'cloud' drive or on a CD or external hard drive that is stored at a location AWAY from our place of residence? If you are, like me, into preserving your family's memories, you are probably likely to take these precautions, but the average person usually does not, and when nature strikes, generations of memories may be lost. We also need to continue to support our libraries in their efforts to digitize historical records, because, unfortunately, they suffer from the effects of natural disasters just as much as the rest of society. (By the way, the image above is the front page of the Chicago Herald Examiner from March 20, 1925. On March 18, 1925, an exceptionally strong and long-lived tornado (or a continuous series of strong tornadoes - it is still debated), completely destroyed several towns in Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana, killing 695 people and injuring over 2,000. It is known as the Tri-State Tornado and, to this day, remains the deadliest tornado in our nation's history.) Unless you live under a log, by now you've heard all the hype surrounding Hurricane Sandy which will make landfall along the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Coast tomorrow. Even though I don't work as a meteorologist anymore, I am nonetheless still very much fascinated by these large weather events and the impacts that they have on people and society. I still regularly look at weather observations, maps, and computer forecasting models. And, like most professional forecasters, I like to compare current storm happenings with historical events. So, today I thought I would blog about the New England Hurricane of 1938. Here is a surface analysis map from 21 Sep 1938 (left) and the current storm (right): The 1938 Hurricane was actually much stronger than Sandy; it reached Category 5 status on the Saffir-Simpson Scale while it was still over open waters with sustained winds up to 160 mph. It has been estimated that it was probably a Category 3 with maximum sustained winds of 125 mph when it made landfall in Long Island, New York on the afternoon of September 21st. As it approached New England, the storm's forward speed reached an incredible 70 mph, which, when added to the already-fast rotational winds, made the total observed winds at landfall even higher on the right-hand side of the storm. One of my favorite actresses, Katharine Hepburn, experienced this storm first-hand, and it left such a strong impression on her that she dedicated a chapter to it in her autobiography, Me: Stories of My Life. She describes what she and her family members went through in their home on the Connecticut coast:
"Then there was a rip and a crash and the big laundry wing fell off the back of the house. By this time, the wind seemed to have doubled its strength and the tide had risen up over the bulkhead and was rushing across the lawn. The house, which was a big old wooden house built in about 1870, was shaking like a leaf. Windows were being blown out or sucked in. Two of the chimneys had blown down." She then goes on to describe how she, her mother, her brother, and their cook escaped the doomed house by climbing out of a dining room window with a rope and then running to higher ground. About 15 minutes after they escaped, the house "just sailed away - easy as pie - and soon there was nothing at all left on the spot where the house stood for over 60 years." The storm became known as the 'Long Island Express.' It is estimated that anywhere between 600 and 800 people were killed and that 57,000 structures were damaged or destroyed. Thousands of fishing and shipping vessels were also destroyed, which was devastating to the region's economy. The cost of damage in 1938 was about $306 million, which would be equivalent to around $6.3 billion in today's dollars. IF this strong of a hurricane were to ever make landfall along the Long Island and Connecticut coastlines today, the property damage would be well into the tens of billions simply due to the fact that population in these areas has grown a lot since 1938, which means more structures and more personal property would be in danger of destruction. And THAT is one of the reasons why Hurricane Sandy is getting so much press today. Sandy is not as strong of a hurricane as the Long Island Express was, BUT it is a very LARGE, expansive storm that is going to affect millions of people just because of the sheer population density of the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast states. I worked as a meteorologist in the insurance industry, and I am confident that the damage caused by Sandy will be well over a billion dollars. The one benefit of experiencing a hurricane today as opposed to in 1938 is the improvements in weather monitoring and forecasting. Some of the computer forecast models saw this situation coming together over a week ago, and satellite tracking of hurricanes is an invaluable tool to meteorologists today that forecasters in 1938 simply did not have. We have more time to get prepared today, which, as any emergency manager will tell you, does save lives. Because our grandparents and great-grandparents lived in Ohio, my husband and I do not have any people in our family tree who were affected by the 1938 storm. Do you have any ancestors that were affected by this 1938 storm? If you are in the path of Sandy, what are you doing to get ready? ©2012, copyright Emily Kowalski Schroeder |
Emily Kowalski SchroederArchives
April 2017
Categories
All
|